Press play to take heed to this text

Russian President Vladimir Putin is enjoying hardball with the European Union — reducing off fuel deliveries to a few of Russia’s greatest prospects in a howl of rage on the sanctions imposed after invading Ukraine.

It is placing huge political strain on governments, threatens to depart Europeans freezing if this winter is a chilly one, and doubtlessly undermines the bloc’s local weather objectives as international locations substitute gas-fired energy with coal. It might even tip the Continent into recession.

Simone Tagliapietra, an analyst with the Bruegel assume tank, calls Russia’s insurance policies “power blackmail.”

Solely 40 % of the conventional quantity of fuel is flowing alongside the undersea Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream pipeline, which is affecting deliveries to France, Italy and Austria in addition to Germany. Russia’s fuel export monopoly Gazprom has already halted all deliveries to Poland, Bulgaria, the Netherlands, Finland and Denmark after power corporations in these international locations refused to kowtow to Kremlin calls for to pay for deliveries in rubles.

In response, some international locations are planning to fireplace up coal-fired energy stations.

“It have to be acknowledged that Putin is decreasing the fuel provide to Europe little by little, additionally to drive up the value, and we should reply with our measures,” German Economic system and Local weather Minister Robert Habeck mentioned in a tv interview late Sunday, including that “it is a tense, severe scenario.”

Austria plans to covert a shuttered energy plant to once more burn coal.

Poland goals to subsidize coal used for residence heating.

The Netherlands on Monday determined to scrap earlier plans to restrict manufacturing from its 4 coal-fired energy stations.

“If these weren’t particular occasions, we might by no means do that,” said Local weather Minister Rob Jetten.

Italy’s authorities is planning a disaster assembly on Tuesday and Prime Minister Mario Draghi has ordered two regasification models for liquefied pure fuel and has been speaking to international locations together with Qatar, Angola and Algeria to signal fuel provide offers in a determined bid to safe provides in case of a Russian shut-off.

Brussels is eager to venture confidence however the fear is evident.

“We take the scenario we’re in very severe. However we’re ready,” European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen mentioned in a gathering with reporters on Monday. “We’re in troublesome occasions. Occasions should not getting simpler,” she added.

Soiled offers

The push to burn coal to safe power provide is symbolically awkward for local weather aware Europeans. However few count on it to blow the EU or its member states far off track of their efforts to chop greenhouse fuel emissions.

In Germany, officers are adamant that the return of coal can be short-lived and doesn’t jeopardize the nation’s observe to zero out coal energy by 2030. Coal will act as a reserve provide for the facility sector, permitting the nation to construct up its shops of fuel forward of winter. In the meantime, the federal government is planning to quickly enhance clear energy.   

The Neurath coal-fired energy plant in Germany | Andreas Rentz/Getty Photographs

Russia’s invasion has hardened political assist for renewables in Germany, mentioned Simon Müller, director of the Agora Energiewende assume tank.

“This extra layer of urgency that we now have within the face of this example helps to supply the political momentum that we want for some essential accelerations within the renewable construct out,” mentioned Müller. The German parliament is contemplating 10 power effectivity and renewable power measures and Müller mentioned the three-party coalition was broadly aligned on the significance of eradicating limitations to inexperienced energy.

Inexperienced teams had been additionally sanguine. “There isn’t a plan in any respect in Germany in the intervening time to place the coal exit date unsure,” mentioned Christoph Bals, the coverage director of NGO Germanwatch.

However the necessity to quickly change tack on scrapping coal is ramping up political tensions.

In Berlin, the conservative opposition lambasted Habeck for permitting a rise in coal use whereas ruling out protecting Germany’s three remaining nuclear energy vegetation working previous the tip of this 12 months.

“I do not perceive that the Inexperienced local weather minister prefers to let extra coal vegetation run longer, slightly than carbon impartial nuclear energy vegetation,” Jens Spahn, deputy head of the Christian Democrats in parliament, told German tv on Monday. The nuclear shutdown coverage was one adopted by his get together’s former chief, Angela Merkel.

The coverage can also be inflicting stress throughout the governing coalition.

“What is critical is to maintain the three remaining nuclear energy vegetation working longer,” mentioned Bijan Djir-Sarai, basic secretary of the liberal Free Democrats. “It is a undeniable fact that the financial system minister can’t merely ignore.”

Admitting the step was “breaking a taboo,” Habeck mentioned coal was nonetheless higher than reviving atomic power, arguing {that a} change in nuclear coverage would solely have an effect on the finish of subsequent 12 months — too late to assist this winter. He was backed up by Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who mentioned in an interview revealed Monday that “nuclear energy will not assist us now, not within the subsequent two years, which is what issues.”

Political leaders are calling on their folks to preserve power and reduce fuel use, whereas governments work to spice up storage ranges to permit the Continent to climate a winter Russian fuel cutoff. As a final resort, they’re mulling fuel rationing.

A halt in fuel provides would virtually actually tip the bloc right into a recession. The European Central Financial institution warned that the eurozone would contract by 1.7 % subsequent 12 months ought to Russia shut the faucet totally.

“The power provide disruptions and the low potentialities for an instantaneous substitution of fuel provides from Russia would seemingly require some rationing and reallocation of assets, leading to manufacturing cuts within the euro space, particularly in energy-intensive sectors,” the financial institution mentioned, predicting if that occurred, the bloc’s financial system would recuperate subsequent 12 months.

However the ECB additionally had a phrase of warning for Putin.

“Concerning the Russian financial system, the situation contains a extreme recession with a contraction in output much like the contraction skilled when the Soviet Union collapsed.”

This text is a part of POLITICO Professional

The one-stop-shop answer for coverage professionals fusing the depth of POLITICO journalism with the facility of know-how


Unique, breaking scoops and insights


Custom-made coverage intelligence platform


A high-level public affairs community